← back to explore

Documented path

Simon Last

Founders / operators · Founder/Entrepreneur · milestone at age 23 ·Field-leading
Selected age-relative milestone · age 23
Co-founded Notion with Ivan Zhao around 2013 at about age 23, serving as technical co-founder/CTO on the all-in-one workspace product that later became a multi-billion-dollar company.

Engineering-focused co-founder who partnered with Ivan Zhao in the early 2010s; sources describe him as in his early twenties when hired/partnered for Notion. The duo rebuilt Notion after a near-failure period and shipped the product that defined modern modular workspaces.

Starting point

Not fully documented; partnered with Ivan Zhao in early twenties as Notion technical co-founder (~2013).

Current position (2025)

Co-founder and CTO of Notion; continues as core product/engineering leader of the multi-billion workspace company.

Where the conditions came from

Three sources, read side by side

Each is placed on a −1 to 3 scale from documented evidence, and the three are never added together. A combined total would rank Simon Last against other people. Held apart, they explain why this path ran differently from another one—which is the only comparison this project supports.

The marble itself

What they brought

+1Tailwind

What capability, drive, or early skill is documented in the person rather than their surroundings?

University of Maryland CS student who joined Notion after Zhao found his visual programming portfolio on Twitter. Dropped out of UMD to work full-time. Capable engineer with interest in visual programming, but thin public biographical detail limits assessment.

Where it was dropped

What they were handed

0Neither way

What money, family standing, network, or permission was already in place before the work began?

Family background not publicly documented. No information available on parents' professions, wealth, or domain connections. Scored conservatively based on absence of evidence.

The shape of the track

What surrounded them

+2Tailwind

What place, timing, institution, or peer group made the next step available?

Ivan Zhao partnership was the defining cofounder relationship. SF startup scene and the Notion rebuild in Kyoto (cost arbitrage) shaped the early product. Zhao's mother provided a $150K emergency loan. Akshay Kothari later joined as third co-founder/COO.

A −1 is a documented headwind, not a missing value; a 0 means the sources record nothing notable either way. Annotation confidence: Low. These are analyst readings of what the sources record, not measurements of merit, talent, or effort. The twenty-two scored dimensions remain available inside the deeper research detail.

What moved through the conditions

Perseverance and luck stay visible—not scored.

Documented perseveranceThe duo rebuilt Notion after a near-failure period and shipped the product that defined modern modular workspaces.

This records repeated behaviour or recovery described by sources; it is not a grit or merit score.

Event luckNotion gained viral product-led growth among knowledge workers.

This is an unchosen opening or condition in the record, not an estimate of how much luck caused the outcome.

Open the legacy 22-field research annotation
How this path compounded
01 Starting advantages

6/24 starting-position score

Strongest documented signals: Exceptional peer / cofounder, Frontier geography, Early online platform.

Describes the starting position, not what the person later made of it.

Cohort percentile: 76
02 Built or converted leverage

11/25 multiplying-capacity score

Strongest observed levers: Complementary team, Scarce skill depth, Structural wave / timing.

Measures what was present, not whether it was inherited, earned, self-built, external, or mixed.

Cohort percentile: 73
03 Compounding trajectory

5 documented steps

The timeline below shows the sequence of work and transitions around the selected early milestone. It is evidence of a path, not proof that every step was necessary.

Milestone at age 23
04 Observed career standing

T2 · Field-leading

Dominant figure at the top of a field. The tier summarizes documented career recognition through the data cutoff—not Simon Last's worth or future potential.

Question four · where did the leverage come from?

Simon Last's leverage provenance

Each non-zero lever gets a best-supported origin, evidence signals, and confidence. Unresolved is the honest default when the biography cannot distinguish self-built, advantage-enabled, earned, external, or mixed.

Complementary team2/2
Advantage-enabledmedium confidence

One or more documented starting advantages plausibly enabled this lever.

Exceptional peer / cofounder (2/2)Early online platform (1/2)
Scarce skill depth2/3
Advantage-enabledmedium confidence

One or more documented starting advantages plausibly enabled this lever.

Early online platform (1/2)
Structural wave / timing2/3
Externalmedium confidence

A structural wave is external to the person, even when their position improved access to it.

Frontier geography (1/2)Early online platform (1/2)
Concentration intensity2/3
Advantage-enabledmedium confidence

One or more documented starting advantages plausibly enabled this lever.

Adversity / constraint catalyst (1/2)
Domain proximity1/2
Advantage-enabledmedium confidence

One or more documented starting advantages plausibly enabled this lever.

Direct domain exposure (1/2)Frontier geography (1/2)
Prior reps1/3
Advantage-enabledmedium confidence

One or more documented starting advantages plausibly enabled this lever.

Early online platform (1/2)
Elite ecosystem network1/3
Advantage-enabledmedium confidence

One or more documented starting advantages plausibly enabled this lever.

Frontier geography (1/2)Exceptional peer / cofounder (2/2)

This is a bounded inference from the current annotations—not a claim about private effort, merit, or the percentage of Simon Last's outcome attributable to any origin.

Luck is not a leftover score.

Structural luck, Encounter luck, Event luck, Outcome variance can change every arrow in the path. This successful-only dataset cannot observe the near-identical paths that did not break through, so luck stays visible and unscored.

Within Founders / operators, Simon Last's starting-advantage total is at the 76th percentile. Separately, their built or converted leverage total is at the 73th percentile. Other T2 profiles average 7.8 / 24 starting advantage and 12.4 / 25 leverage. Similar scores appear in other tiers, so these figures describe positioning—not a cause.
Trajectory
  1. 2013 · age 23
    Co-founded Notion with Ivan Zhao and raised early angel capital.
  2. 2015 · age 25
    Helped rebuild Notion from near-collapse into a shippable modular workspace.
  3. 2018 · age 28
    Notion gained viral product-led growth among knowledge workers.
  4. 2021 · age 31
    Notion reached multi-billion valuations and global scale.
  5. 2024 · age 34
    Notion expanded AI features and passed 100M users (company-reported).
Primary leverage engine
Scarce technical / intellectual depth
Scarce technical / intellectual depth
Secondary engine
Product / domain insight
Built/converted leverage
11 / 25
evidence: Medium
Built or converted leverage

Multiplying capacity documented later in the path. Measures what was present, not whether it was inherited, earned, self-built, external, or mixed.

Started serious reps before 20
0/1
Prior reps
1/3
Scarce skill depth
2/3
Native distribution
0/3
Elite ecosystem network
1/3
Complementary team
2/2
Structural wave / timing
2/3
Concentration intensity
2/3
Capital safety
0/2
Domain proximity
1/2
Starting-advantage scores (0–2 each)

Access or conditions documented near the beginning of the path. Zero means "no clear evidence in reviewed sources," not "advantage was absent."

Family financial platform
0/2
Parent / family domain
0/2
Inherited audience / network
0/2
Elite institution pipeline
0/2
Frontier geography
1/2
Rare early tools
0/2
Dedicated mentor / coach
0/2
Exceptional peer / cofounder
2/2
Early online platform
1/2
Direct domain exposure
1/2
Prodigy / innate ability
0/2
Adversity / constraint catalyst
1/2

Family context

Not documented in reviewed sources.

Parent / family domain

Not documented in reviewed sources.

Archetype & tags
High-trust peer teamZhao partnershipfull-stack rebuildproduct craftSF startup scene
Evidence summary

Last is consistently described as Notion's technical co-founder from ~2013 (CSV birth 1990 → ~age 23). The pair nearly shut down, then rebuilt the product; advantage is complementary cofounder intensity and product craft rather than documented family capital. Public biographical detail is thinner than for Zhao.

advantage confidence: Medium · source count: 3 · audit: source_verified · status: subagent_researched_beta

Sources
Related — same primary engine