Interactive path comparison

Am I the next Patrick McKenzie?

A questionnaire can compare visible ingredients. It cannot reproduce Patrick McKenzie's timing, leverage origins, encounters, trajectory, or luck. Take the short quiz—then see exactly where the analogy stops working.

Milestone at 22Starting advantage 3/24Built/converted leverage 11/25Observed standing T3 · Domain-recognized

Independent educational analysis. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or predictive of becoming Patrick McKenzie.

The comparison is the doorway, not the answer. A high match means some documented fields look similar. It does not mean the fields came from the same origins, interacted in the same order, or will produce the same outcome.

What the record actually contains

Patrick McKenzie's visible path ingredients

American software founder best known online as patio11; started Bingo Card Creator while working as a salaryman-style software engineer in Japan, iterated on pricing and marketing publicly, and built one of the best-documented indie bootstrap case studies of the late 2000s.

Starting position · 3/24

Starting advantages

Early online platform2/2
Direct domain exposure1/2

Multiplying capacity · 11/25

Built or converted leverage

Scarce skill depthAdvantage-enabled origin · medium confidence2/3
Structural wave / timingExternal origin · medium confidence2/3
Concentration intensityUnresolved origin · low confidence2/3
Capital safetyUnresolved origin · low confidence1/2

The surface comparison

Which visible ingredients do you share?

These questions are selected from Patrick McKenzie's strongest documented fields. For leverage, you will also identify where yours came from—the distinction a raw score hides.

The result is surface resemblance: descriptive overlap across the selected fields, not the probability that you become Patrick McKenzie.

Your starting advantages

What access or conditions were present near the beginning?

1. Did you have meaningful early online platform near the start?

No clear accessMeaningfulUnusually strong

2. Did you have meaningful direct domain exposure near the start?

No clear accessMeaningfulUnusually strong

Your built or converted leverage

How much multiplying capacity is present now—and where did it come from?

1. How strongly does scarce skill depth describe your current path?

0/31/32/33/3

Where did most of yours come from?

2. How strongly does structural wave / timing describe your current path?

0/31/32/33/3

Where did most of yours come from?

3. How strongly does concentration intensity describe your current path?

0/31/32/33/3

Where did most of yours come from?

4. How strongly does capital safety describe your current path?

0/21/22/2

Where did most of yours come from?

What no quiz can recover

Luck acts across the entire path

Luck is not a fifth score. It changes the transitions between starting position, capability, trajectory, and outcome—and this successful-only dataset cannot estimate its size.

Structural luck

Birthplace, era, family, geography, institutions, and being near the right frontier.

Encounter luck

Meeting a collaborator, mentor, coach, investor, selector, or first customer.

Event luck

An algorithm boost, market shock, competitor failure, injury avoided, or unexpected opening.

Outcome variance

Similar visible inputs can still produce different results for reasons the record cannot recover.

Sequence matters

A score cannot reproduce this ordering

2006 · age 22Launched Bingo Card Creator
Beginning multi-year indie SaaS business.
2010 · age 26Quit day job after BCC and consulting income covered living costs.
2015 · age 31Sold Bingo Card Creator after ~9 years of operation.

The useful conclusion

You do not need to become the next Patrick McKenzie.

Use this profile to inspect mechanisms, not borrow an identity. Your relevant problem is which moves fit your starting conditions, current leverage, constraints, timing, and acceptable risks.

Inspect Patrick McKenzie's full path Choose another person